Sunday 27 May 2012

Why am I grumpy?.


  
There was an advertisement of Saffola cooking oil which used to be screened a year or so back. It had a hero worshipping son and doting wife cheer an obviously overweight father/husband during a parent’s event at the child’s school sports day. The overweight gentleman obviously cannot make it and a pious voice in the background addresses the wife (who herself looks fit enough to run a marathon) – “Now you must choose Saffola.”
What does this ad say to you? It says to me, as it must to any sane, thinking person;

1.       Women stay fit on  their own. Men don’t.
2.      
       2.  Even if women are unfit, Saffola should be brought in only when the men are unwell. It is alright for women to live with cholesterol, pop a heart attack. It is not alright for the men. Why not, I want to ask, since it is the men who cannot take care of themselves.  Survival of the fittest, I say.

3.   3    Men are incapable of controlling their cholesterol and other things that make them drop out of races at their children’s schools. Hence the pious voice addresses the wife, not the husband. Has anyone realized what this means for us – much of our money, our health, our government is in the hands of men. Now if he cannot be trusted to buy the correct cooking  oil, is he fit enough to deal with my hard earned money?

For those of you reading this and thinking that I am a grumpy, cynical pessimist and the wife’s concern is one of pure love, how about you showing me one advertisement where, as soon as a wife gets her premenstrual cramps, a pious voice advises the concerned looking husband, “Now you must buy food with lots of iron.”

Show me. And I might believe. I still want to.

And now, since I have claimed that this blog would be based on my experiences as a woman, a confession is due. I must admit that my angst on the Saffola advertisement above is not fuelled purely by an upright anger over a woman’s secondary place in society. Part of the angst also stems from my secondary place at the lunch table at work. This secondary place is also shared by some of my other female colleagues.

At this lunch table as I and some of the aforementioned female colleagues take out our tiffin cases or bring in a usual ‘thali’ from the canteen, many, if not all of our male colleagues are unpacking elaborate tiffin boxes. The gentleman in front of me takes out a Tupperware box. Large size. This box yields lovingly folded and packed rotis, a little dollop of rice. Some fish, some dal, a little vegetable. A chilli and a lemon wedge. Oh. And even a sweet. And there is a napkin – clean and fresh. And some lassi to wash this down with. I look at my healthy but practical box of sabu dana khichdi. Which is all I have time for making. And it’s healthy, isn’t it?

 My male colleague catches us staring stonily at his lunch box. He has the courtesy to look a little embarrassed, and says, ”Actually you see, I have very high cholesterol, so Meenu is very particular about what I eat,” The Saffola ad comes flooding back.

My female colleague, whose tiffin resembles mine responds grumpily, “I tell you, Malini – there’s not much point in marrying a husband. I think I want to marry a wife now. I also want a tiffin like his.” I agree completely and plod grimly through my sabu dana khichdi. And hold society responsible seating me at the lunch table without allowing me a partner who looks after my cholesterol and lunch box.   

There are So Many Things to be grumpy about.

Sunday 13 May 2012

the yumminess of mummies




We sat reluctantly in two uncomfortable chairs. But it was the whole atmosphere that made us really uncomfortable. The head priest of the ‘faith based organisation’ sat at right angles to us. The room was large and airy. The walls were full of pictures of the farm we had come to survey for our agricultural practices study. The door opposite us sent in a regular stream of devotees. They came in one by one, prostrated themselves at the feet of the head of the institution, held his feet in their hands for a while and crept away.

While they did so, the head priest, quite undisturbed by this foot holding, lectured us – two women who had come to see his farm, on the status of women. It took us a while to get used to the prostrations and he got the head start – we were unable to respond to his starting salvoes like, “Women are their own worst enemies”. And boldened by our silence he continued – he told us that women had two primary roles in life ad they had to choose between them. The choices were between the maternal and the sexual. He knew and was saddened by the fact that the majority of women chose the sexual role. We stared at him, speechless. And allowed him to continue. Thankfully, because if we had interfered, we would have missed this gem -

He then told us about a mother of 3 children he had travelled with in a train. This mother, instead of watching over her children, had handed them over to her husband and maid and gone to sleep. “Sleep!” he exclaimed, shaking his head. Ad then he looked at us and said, “The sexual role (he used the beautiful vernacular word ‘kamayani’) impels women to neglect their children and do such things like going to sleep.”

By now we had regained our powers of speech but that is a different story. I remembered this incident because in many ways it marked a turning point I my life. I was forced to acknowledge my conscience’s now faint voice that I stood in grave danger of adhering to the head priest’s role model of the maternal role of women.  Did I then want to give up that role and adopt the sexual role?  No, I did not. I was realizing that doing any one role to the exclusion of all other roles was impossible and extremely exhausting. And I was also realizing that I wanted it all – a little bit of every role – mother, companion, friend, worker, daughter, daughter in law, political person, and yes, also that of a kamayani. And this realization was not a momentous one.

A few weeks ago, I had had a moment of epiphany. It was the middle of the early morning chaos. My daughters were getting ready for school, looking gorgeous as they always do. I was combing their hair, checking their bags and instructing Rama, my wonderfully efficient housekeeper o the day’s plans and giving my hair a last brush before I left home for work. As I looked into the mirror, I found myself looking at a stranger. She was wearing a yellow salwar set which didn’t fit, had a hairstyle that didn’t suit, wore shoes that didn’t match. And she was drinking Horlicks. Yes, Horlicks. She looked harassed, dowdy and virtuous. My conscience made one of its rare appearances, crying out in pain, “MG!! Not yellow darling, and definitely not that shade!” For a moment I had stared at that yellow suited stranger in horror. But the Rama marched in checking on me – had I finished my Horlicks? The moment passed, I returned to the present. But something had changed. A restlessness crept in and remained. 
Rama looked at my unfinished Horlicks and gave me an odd look.

Life went on – that day and after that. But the restlessness remained. My conscience took to nagging and complaining about yellow and its impact on my children. Irritated, I shut it out and refused to listen. Of course it wasn’t true. I was a good mother, I was. With two growing children what did you expect? That I would look like Demi Moore? Or that I would have time to chill out with a drink or two at Someplace Else? Never. My children needed all my time. Their welfare was my foremost concern. So what if I wore floaters with salwar suits, my children looked like angels. Sometimes, my conscience managed to get in a word, but was quickly put into a box and put away.

But after this maternal-sexual role model conversation today, my conscience emerged victorious. The danger was clear and imminent. My conscience had not spoken to me since its comment on my yellow salwar suit, but now it made a reappearance. It hung around in easy chairs, sipping tea, smirking and saying, “Ha. I told you so.”

“Shoo.” I said, “Go away!”

“Calm down,” said my conscience, taunting me “Have some Horlicks, darling.”

I have believed firmly that there is a time for everything I your life – and that time is when you yourself are ready for it. It had worked for me earlier and hopefully it would work for me now. I knew I would not survive my present mothering role. And probably neither would my children. I returned home from that tour a changed person. I don’t know what was a more terrifying realization – that I had give up listening to my own voice? Or that I was heading towards being a role model for people like this head priest. My ego and conscience were hit hard.    

And I prepared for change on a war footing. I started with Horlicks to find that the wise Rama had already disposed off the bottle of Horlicks. “I thought you didn’t need it anymore,” she said in her usual taciturn manner and that was that. The haircut changed, the shoes were put away, but I kept the yellow salwar suit to remind me how close I had come to disaster.

I now promised myself to be the mother I myself wanted to be. Stress and virtuousness had to go and so they went. Guilt went too. So did sleepless nights. It wasn’t easy but well worth the trouble. Were my children happier? You’ll have to ask them, but I think the answer would be yes. Am I happier? The answer is definitely yes.

Is it easy? No. Do I have detractors? Yes. What answers do I give them? Usually an enigmatic silence, sometimes a glare or a raised eyebrow. And a hope that in spite of all the criticism I face for being a non traditional mother, one day the time will come when I can hang about my detractors in easy chairs, sipping a cup of tea, a smirk on my face and say, “Ha. I told you so.”

Not a virtuous thing to wish for. But then, my brief and unsuccessful stint with being virtuous is officially over.   
--