I have never been able to exactly explain to people why I do
not call myself a feminist. Actually I have not been able to do that to myself
very well either. Inspite of considerable and consistent temptation, there’s
always been that little voice that says, “Maybe….”
Having done much soul searching, I have my own theories on
this and one of them is this:
Feminism left out the nitty gritty. And since I have a
practical rather than intellectual bent of mind, I remained skeptical about
being told what to do, but not how to do it.
Dont get me wrong, I am a great supporter of feminism, and
deeply respect this ideology and its accompanying struggle. I am part of it and
it is a part of me. I have lived my life by its thinking. My first encounter
with de Beauvoir produced in me the same excitement and fascination as my first
reading of Marx. (Like a good Bengali, I had read the latter before the former)
However, while
it did radicalize my life, it did not answer all my questions. There were words
that set fire to your soul, - ““Those of us who stand outside the circle of this society's
definition of acceptable women; those of us who have been forged in the
crucibles of difference - know that survival is not an academic skill...For the master's tools will not dismantle
the master's house. They will never allow us to bring about genuine change.”
But
where were our tools? Here I was, in strength, support and solidarity with a million
other women and a spattering of men, ready to break down things, but our hands
were empty. And with empty hands, ladies and gentlemen, the struggle naught
availeth. Unless you are a karate expert, of course.
Give my
practical bent of mind, I shall now discuss two tools as examples of how this
impacted feminism and my own classification/non classification as a feminist. These
are explained below with real life examples:
Example 1:
For once, they asked before I asked. Since I always struggled to find a vernacular
for this, and since that gave rise to a manner of anxieties and
misunderstandings, I was greatly
relieved. My two escorts, with a great air of importance, walked me along
purposefully. And they kept telling
everyone they met, where I was being taken. Everyone nodded and smiled and I
smiled back uncertainly. I reached the house to find all the ladies of the
house gathered to welcome me. Quite nonplussed, I hummed and hawed but everyone
else chattered away till someone said, “Orey! Give Didi the gamchhas!”
To my great relief, the group had dispersed by the time I
emerged. Not knowing what to do with the gamchhas I left them behind on a shelf
in the toilets. I stayed I the same house that night to find that this was the
only pucca toilet I the village and was used by no one. But since it was a
status symbol for the family, it was kept incredibly clean. Over the next few
moths, I stayed over at this village often, or dropped by en route to and fro
the interiors. As a development professional in a dairy cooperative project, I
spent two thirds of my time in these villages of South Bengal. More often than
not, it was the luxury of a clean and private toilet that brought me here. (And
I did, eventually figure out what the two gamchhas were for.)
These were my pre-feminist days, and I took the absence of
toilets as an infrastructural one rather than a patriarchal one. Rural India, I
thought and left it at that. But it was one of the biggest challenges of field work,
multiplied a million times during menstruation. And one
of the first things that I thought of when I started reading feminism was “Oh
my God, they left out the toilets!”
And when I think of the billion dollar cosmetics industry, and
now the fitness epidemic, because that is what it is, I cannot think of the
lack of sanitation for women as an infrastructural problem any more.
And so to my next example –
Like ABBA sang, it’s a rich man’s world. Not a rich woman’s. In one of her talks that I had attended, Kamla
Bhasin had said that in all her questioning of the aspirations of women, no
women told her they wanted to be rich. And she rued the fact that there were
still so few rich women. As do I, as I rue the fact that if I had learnt to
treat money like men do, I myself might have been a rich woman. Money still
remains a male bastion. If you don’t believe me, go look at the statistics of
female bankers and stock brokers. (Just because I am writing a blog doesn’t mean
I will do all the hard work)
While I agree that more and more women are earning better
and better salaries, I am not sure how may of them manage their money well.Those who have moey are usure or ucomfortable i handling money. I
am myself always unsure of what to do with the little I have. Beyond of the
fixed deposit ad a few LICs, I’ve shot my bolt. I do not have a single female friend
who gives me advice on money. They give me advice on happiness and self esteem.
Only my male friends give me advice on money. And I have always had a sneaking
suspicion that the latter is a significant contributor to the former.
And this brings me back to where I started – why not call myself
a feminist. I now realize that I shrink from calling myself a feminist because
I have failed to be a good feminist. An ideology is just about that – an ideology.
Every person who believes in the ideology will have to take it into her soul
and interpret it to change her life. I have taken it into my soul, but my
interpretation of it in my life is incomplete. The day this is complete, when
there are enough toilets for rural women and my financial portfolio is
satisfactorily diversified between debt and equity, I shall accept, with great
pride, the label of a feminist.